On Nov 27, 2007 9:45 AM, Andy Parkins <andyparkins@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Marco Costalba wrote: > > > But...wait...Qt would require...(I'm scared to say!)... that awful, > > painful, hopeless thing called C++. Probably you didn't mean what you > > said ;-) > > Actually although I like C++, that's not the reason, the reason is that Qt > is a significantly (IMHO) better toolkit than Tk. It's more cross platform > and looks a lot nicer. The fact that it's C++ is neither here nor there. > Actually there exist a Python bindings for Qt if you prefer. I was just joking about C++, never meant to start a "language war" that I personally consider as very very un-useful and very pity. Marco - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
