Re: If you would write git from scratch now, what would you change?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> If you would write git from scratch now, from the beginning, without
> concerns for backwards compatibility, what would you change, or what
> would you want to have changed?

Get rid of plumbing at the command line level.  It is confusing to
users, and command line arguments, exec calls and I/O streams are not
efficient and reasonably typed mechanisms for the kind of operations
done in plumbing.  Instead using a good extensible portable scripting
language (I consider Lua quite suitable in that regard, but it is
conceivable that something with a native list type supporting easy
sorts, merges and selections could be more efficient) and implementing
plumbing in that or in C would have been preferable for creating the
porcelain.

That would keep plumbing out of the hair of users and make it easier to
cobble together extensions and variations with non-trivial internal
dataflow.

Shell scripts have also proven to be a constant hassle with regard to
portability and bugs (like underquoting).

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux