On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, Jeff King wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 01:23:44PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > Maybe we could change the (non-fast forward) message into (non-fast > > forward; need to pull?). > > Not unreasonable, although I think our line length is getting a bit > long. Rejected refs would look something like (actually they say > "[rejected]" but the text is column-aligned with the X's): > > ! XXXXXXX...XXXXXXX ref_name -> ref_name (non-fast forward; need to pull?) > > There's 58 characters of text not including the two ref_names, leaving > about 11 characters for each ref name. The name of this topic, > jk/send-pack, would overflow an 80-character terminal: > > ! [rejected] jk/send-pack -> jk/send-pack (non-fast forward; need to pull?) I personally think this is a bad idea, especially after all the efforts that has been put into making those lines not to wrap. Yet the message itself is not totally accurate either, since "need to pull" might have to be "need to force" in some cases. I think that would be better to append a single line at the end of the display with a clue about what "non fast forward" means. Nicolas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
