Re: [PATCH 5/5] Added diff hunk coloring to git-add--interactive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 01:37:55PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > Unfortunately, there is a historical wart that probably still needs
> > supporting, which is that the original names were diff.color.*. Or have
> > we officially removed support for that yet?
> 
> Neither officially or unofficially yet, but we can start the
> process of making it official with an early announcement.  I do
> not think we would hurt people as long as a long enough advance
> notice is given.

Andy Parkins added color.* (and removed documentation for *.color)
almost a year ago (in a159ca0c). But I don't think there has been an
official deprecation notice.

> I however am wondering if we need to have so many "enable color
> support" switches.  color.status, color.diff, and now yet
> another color.interactive?  Who sets color.status and/or
> color.interactive to auto without setting color.diff to auto as
> well?

Yes, I have often thought this, as well, and a "color.all" would
probably be convenient.

-Peff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux