On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 08:46:46PM -0500, Justin Tobler wrote:
> diff --git a/builtin/clone.c b/builtin/clone.c
> index 9eb66234bc..3b166b05e3 100644
> --- a/builtin/clone.c
> +++ b/builtin/clone.c
> @@ -1523,7 +1523,7 @@ int cmd_clone(int argc,
> }
>
> remote_head = find_ref_by_name(refs, "HEAD");
> - remote_head_points_at = guess_remote_head(remote_head, mapped_refs, 0, 0);
> + remote_head_points_at = guess_remote_head(remote_head, mapped_refs, 0, 1);
>
> if (option_branch) {
> our_head_points_at = find_remote_branch(mapped_refs, option_branch);
Makes sense. You don't have control over the branch name anyway when
cloning, so it's nonsensical to print that advise. Another subsequent
step could be to turn the `advise()` into `advise_if_enabled()`, but
that change isn't really needed for git-clone(1) because there wouldn't
ever be a reason to print it.
Do we want to add a test somewhere that demonstrates that we don't print
the advise anymore?
Thanks for fixing this!
Patrick
