Re: t9106 failure, bisect weirdness

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Ok thanks for doing that too.
> Could you also look at the "file" when the test succeed and when it does not 
> and send us both versions and a diff between them (if it's not too big).

Size-wise, they're tiny -- though there's a lot of lines.

The diff:

ramune/lycaeum:t: diff -u works.t fails.t 
--- works.t     2007-11-20 21:54:29.000000000 -0700
+++ fails.t     2007-11-20 21:54:39.000000000 -0700
@@ -55,9 +55,9 @@
 55
 56
 57
-5588
+58
 59
 60
-6611
+61
 62
 63

And the full (working) file:

1
2
3
4444
5
6
7777
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
5588
59
60
6611
62
63

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux