Re: [PATCH 3/3] meson: don't install git-pack-redundant(1) docs with breaking changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 10:06:51AM +0000, Phillip Wood wrote:
> On 17/03/2025 14:50, Phillip Wood wrote:
> > 
> > Oh so if we have selected breaking_changes then manpages.keys() does not
> > include "git-pack-redundant.adoc" but that file exists and so we need to
> > add it to the list of configured man pages. If breaking_changes is
> > selected then don't we end up adding "git-pack-redundant.adoc" to
> > configured_manpages twice? Does that matter when we come to do
> > 
> > actual_manpages = run_command(shell, '-c', 'ls git*.adoc scalar.adoc',
> >    check: true,
> >    env: script_environment,
> > ).stdout().strip().split('\n')
> > 
> > if configured_manpages != actual_manpages
> >    ...
> > 
> > ? Also I'm confused as to how that comparison works without sorting
> > configured_manpages. Even if manpages.keys() sorts the keys (the
> > documentation at [1] is silent on that) we add some out-of-order entries
> > to the end of the list.
> 
> I think the answer is that the comparison always fails but as there are no
> missing or superfluous man pages the body of the if does not error out.

Yeah. We indeed may have it multiple times now, but as you noticed it
ultimately still works. I didn't care too deeply to avoid the
duplication because in the end this step is only used to verify that we
have all manpages wired up in Meson.

Patrick




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux