On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 09:41:39PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 04:18:44PM -0400, Taylor Blau wrote: > > > In a similar fashion as previous commits, use nth_midxed_pack() instead > > of accessing the MIDX's ->packs array directly to support incremental > > MIDXs. > > Probably not worth it to change it in an actual patch, but is it worth > renaming midx->packs to something else to make sure we catch all of the > spots that need to be considered? Or maybe you already did that, which > is how you found all of these. :) That's how I found them originally ;-). Thanks, Taylor
