Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 14/03/2025 23:23, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Entirely up to you. I do not plan to perform an in-detail review on >> the topic (I do not consider myself quite qualified), but others who >> saw earlier rounds of the patch may want to say "now this is perfect" >> or "now this is perfect with this and that changes", and if you do not >> think the differenes between v3 and your upcoming v4 are small enough, >> it may be more efficient to wait for a bit to collect more comments. > > I'm not an expert on our completion script but from a general shell > scripting perspective this version looks fine to me. OK, then let me see if I can squash in before merging the topic to 'next'.
