On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 1:19 PM Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/ewah/ewah_bitmap.c b/ewah/ewah_bitmap.c
> index e92341b8fa..056c410efb 100644
> --- a/ewah/ewah_bitmap.c
> +++ b/ewah/ewah_bitmap.c
> @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ int ewah_or_iterator_next(eword_t *next, struct ewah_or_iterator *it)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -void ewah_or_iterator_free(struct ewah_or_iterator *it)
> +void ewah_or_iterator_release(struct ewah_or_iterator *it)
> {
> free(it->its);
> }
> diff --git a/ewah/ewok.h b/ewah/ewok.h
> index 4b70641045..c29d354236 100644
> --- a/ewah/ewok.h
> +++ b/ewah/ewok.h
> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ void ewah_or_iterator_init(struct ewah_or_iterator *it,
>
> int ewah_or_iterator_next(eword_t *next, struct ewah_or_iterator *it);
>
> -void ewah_or_iterator_free(struct ewah_or_iterator *it);
> +void ewah_or_iterator_release(struct ewah_or_iterator *it);
Was the rename from these last two hunks squashed into the wrong
patch? Since you're not changing its definition, I'm assuming the
updated name should have been applied to when it was introduced.
