Jeff King, Tue, Nov 20, 2007 12:18:01 +0100: > Instead of intermingling success and failure, we now print: > > 1. all uptodate refs (if args.verbose is enabled) > 2. successfully pushed refs > 3. failed refs I vote for this. The non-ff refs clustered together was the real reason behind my beautification patch. > I am somewhat ambivalent on this patch. In most cases, it won't make a > difference, since the output is small enough. For large pushes, it might > be better to have errors at the end. OTOH, you do still get "error: > failed to push to ..." at the end, and you can scroll up and see the > errors if you like. And it's not like preserving the original ref output > order was all that interesting. It is just simplier to distinguish visually: non-ff's are formatted significantly different. You don't even have to read what is written to immediately notice if there are problems. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html