Re: [PATCH 3/9] t5516: drop NEEDSWORK about v2 reachability behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] t5516: drop NEEDSWORK about v2 reachability behavior
From: Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 17:30:50 -0400
Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>, Igor Todorovski <itodorov@xxxxxxxxxx>, Bence Ferdinandy <bence@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20250309030203.GC2334191@coredump.intra.peff.net>
References: <20250309030101.GA2334064@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20250309030203.GC2334191@coredump.intra.peff.net>

On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 10:02:03PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> At this point that behavior is well established, and I do not think we
> would ever change v2 to match the v0 behavior (and if we did,
> remembering to update this test is the least of our concerns).

;-), indeed.

Thanks,
Taylor

References:
- [PATCH 0/9] fetch: further ref-prefix cleanups and optimizations
  - From: Jeff King
- [PATCH 3/9] t5516: drop NEEDSWORK about v2 reachability behavior
  - From: Jeff King

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/9] t5702: fix typo in test name
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/9] refspec_ref_prefixes(): clean up refspec_item logic
Previous by thread: [PATCH 3/9] t5516: drop NEEDSWORK about v2 reachability behavior
Next by thread: [PATCH 4/9] t5516: beef up exact-oid ref prefixes test
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux