On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 09:06:24AM +0100, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > These two hunks look related to my above observation that we don't have > the check for `num_merge_bases == 1`, as in "merge-recursive.c" we used > to set `opt->ancestor = "constructed merge base" if so. Yeah, I noticed the same thing and agree that it would be helpful to see that spelled out in the commit message. Thanks, Taylor
