Re: Making bit-by-bit reproducible Git Bundles?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Simon Josefsson <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Making bit-by-bit reproducible Git Bundles?
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 09:02:37 -0700
Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Feedback-id: if26b431b:Fastmail
In-reply-to: <871pv2jx4a.fsf@josefsson.org> (Simon Josefsson's message of "Wed, 12 Mar 2025 12:40:05 +0100")
References: <871pv2jx4a.fsf@josefsson.org>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

Simon Josefsson <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Can anyone explain what is causing the irreproducibility?

Multithreading?

References:
- Making bit-by-bit reproducible Git Bundles?
  - From: Simon Josefsson

Prev by Date: [PATCH v6 16/16] refs: reuse iterators when determining refname availability
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3] promisor-remote: fix segfault when remote URL is missing
Previous by thread: Making bit-by-bit reproducible Git Bundles?
Next by thread: Re: Making bit-by-bit reproducible Git Bundles?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux