Re: [PATCH] config.mak.dev: enable -Wunreachable-code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> Maybe not often, if there is only one instance in the current code base.
> Or maybe a lot, but we wouldn't know because we haven't had the warning
> enabled.
>
> I guess another option is to enable it in _one_ CI job that uses clang
> on Linux (maybe linux-sha256?) and see how often it is helpful or
> harmful.

The reason why you said Linux rather than macOS is because the
single instance we know about would not have to be worked around if
we did it that way?

I am OK with that.  

Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux