On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 07:15:14PM -0500, Taylor Blau wrote: > This is a(nother) reroll of my series to fix a bug in freshening objects > with multiple cruft packs. > > The only update since last time is that I dropped the first patch, after > Patrick astutely pointed out a flaw with the approach pursued there. > That flaw is why I wrote '--max-cruft-size' in what appeared to be a > convoluted fashion, but I couldn't remember my line of thinking at the > time. > > As usual, there is a range-diff showing as much below. Thanks again, > Patrick, for catching what would be a very frustrating issue to deal > with later on ;-). Would it maybe make sense to add a commit that explains _why_ the existing algorithm looks as it does so that the next person won't be triggered to remove the code again? Patrick
