Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > But then we have to handle the reftable case too, which Patrick gave a > potential fix to below. But equally fine I think would be to push this > ^^ logic up into refs.c::refs_ref_iterator_begin(), which would fix both > at the same time. Somehow, today seems to be the day to read about "let's push as much common things up from ref backends to the generic ref layer " for me ;-).
