Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > But this unknown type stuff is not and has never been usable. So I'd > propose to keep --literally but always reject unknown types. That sounds like a good way to go. Thanks.
Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > But this unknown type stuff is not and has never been usable. So I'd > propose to keep --literally but always reject unknown types. That sounds like a good way to go. Thanks.
![]() |