Re: [PATCH 10/10] unpack_loose_rest(): rewrite return handling for clarity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 01:34:21AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> This should make the logic a bit easier to follow. It does mean
> duplicating the buf cleanup for errors, but it's a single line.

At least to my eyes, I actually prefer the state after 9/10 and would
probably be OK to see this patch get dropped. I wish I had a compelling
reason *why* I felt that way, but I think it may too subjective.

I don't feel strongly about it either way, though.

Thanks,
Taylor




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux