Re: win+Meson test failures due to ps/build-meson-fixes-0130 topic?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:15:50AM +0100, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:

> > I'm hoping you can tell me I'm holding it wrong, and there's some way to
> > do an incremental build when crossing these sorts of boundaries (without
> > blowing away all of the build products).
> > 
> > I do at least use ccache which makes the "rm -rf" case a little less
> > painful.
> 
> You're not holding it wrong. The problem is that this patch series
> introduces a backwards-incompatible change to the "sane_tools_path"
> option as it changes it from a string to an array, which makes Meson
> hiccup. Once Meson is not considered to be experimental anymore we
> should refrain from changing option types going forward, but until then
> I consider it to be okayish to break things like this.
> 
> From my point of view we can treat Meson as stable as soon as Git v2.49
> is out. So from thereon, I will make sure to not include backwards
> incompatible changes anymore.

Thanks. It's comforting to hear that this is something that's under our
control.

-Peff




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux