Re: win+Meson test failures due to ps/build-meson-fixes-0130 topic?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 11:45:47AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> As of yesterday, 'next' started failing all the "win+Meson test"
> jobs.
> 
> https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/13506034920
> 
> I had to do one of my least favourite activities working on Git:
> bisecting CI breakage on a platform I have no idea how well it
> works.
> 
> Here is the full "stack" of changes, it contains all the topics
> merged between 'master' and 'next', plus a single change that
> butchers .github/workflows/main.yml to leave only three jobs
> (ci-config, windows-meson-build, and windows-meson-test).
> 
>     3a7e83b527 Merge branch 'ps/build-meson-fixes-0130'
>     e59193e984 Merge branch 'ek/mingw-rename-symlink'
>     a209cf1427 Merge branch 'po/meson-perl-fix'
>     9f1e73677c Merge branch 'ua/os-version-capability'
>     82f01cb375 Merge branch 'ms/rename-match-name-with-pattern'
>     8b04381049 Merge branch 'ad/set-default-target-in-makefiles'
>     2cab1bd7d0 Merge branch 'pw/merge-tree-stdin-deadlock-fix'
>     92b43de9df Merge branch 'mh/doc-commit-title-not-subject'
>     685c150623 Merge branch 'bc/diff-reject-empty-arg-to-pickaxe'
>     c5093fc2d8 Merge branch 'tb/new-make-fix'
>     9091607e95 Merge branch 'da/xdiff-w-sign-compare-workaround'
>     01e86410fe GitHub CI: trim and slim for win+Meson test breakage hunting
>     2d2a71ce85 The thirteenth batch
> 
> At 01e86410fe and e59193e984, CI seems to pass.
> 
> https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/13528755524
> 
> With ps/build-meson-fixes-0130 at 3a7e83b527, all the "win+Meson
> test" jobs fail.  I suspect that the series does not break
> individual tests but the breakage is in somewhere more
> framework-ish?  I didn't look into individual test job failures.
> 
> https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/13529323827
> 
> I'll also note that in one of my earlier attempts (which had
> ek/mingw-rename-symlink merged before po/meson-perl-fix), one of the
> 10 "win+Meson test" jobs failed ("win+Meson test (7)" to be exact).
> Rerunning the failed test succeeds, so there must be something flaky
> in t0610-reftable-basics test that is exposed by this change,
> perhaps?
> 
>   https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/13528071468/attempts/1
>   https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/13528071468/attempts/2
> 
> As the ps/build-meson-fixes-0130 topic has 13 changes, and each
> iteration in the above exercise took somewhere around 20 minutes, I
> won't dive into the topic myself to identify which one of these
> individual topics causes the breakage.  This however gave me enough
> to go on to today's 'master' integration (mainly, by mark the topic
> to be held in 'next' until this gets resolved, and deal with the
> other topics).

Hm, interesting. I didn't notice those issues in our CI. Thanks for
diving into it, I'll figure out what has happened here.

Patrick




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux