Lucas Seiki Oshiro <lucasseikioshiro@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Submodule merges are, in general, similar to other merges based on oid
> three-way-merge. When a conflict happens, however, Git has two special
> cases (introduced in 68d03e4a6e44) on handling the conflict before
> yielding it to the user. From the merge-ort and merge-recursive sources:
>
> - "Case #1: a is contained in b or vice versa": both strategies try to
> perform a fast-forward in the submodules if the commit referred by the
> conflicted submodule is descendant of another;
>
> - "Case #2: There are one or more merges that contain a and b in the
> submodule. If there is only one, then present it as a suggestion to the
> user, but leave it marked unmerged so the user needs to confirm the
> resolution."
>
> Add a small paragraph on merge-strategies.adoc describing this behavior.
>
> Helped-by: Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Seiki Oshiro <lucasseikioshiro@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> This v2 changes the documentation text to a clearer explanation (as
> suggested in the v1 review), and changes its location to
> merge-strategies.adoc instead of git-merge.adoc.
>
> This content is duplicated as this works for both `ort` and `recursive`
> strategies.
>
> Documentation/merge-strategies.adoc | 15 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/merge-strategies.adoc b/Documentation/merge-strategies.adoc
> index 5fc54ec060..a7fca249e2 100644
> --- a/Documentation/merge-strategies.adoc
> +++ b/Documentation/merge-strategies.adoc
> @@ -21,6 +21,13 @@ ort::
> ("Ostensibly Recursive's Twin") and came from the fact that it
> was written as a replacement for the previous default
> algorithm, `recursive`.
> +
> + In the case where the path is a submodule, if the submodule commit
> + used on one side of the merge is a descendant of the submodule
> + commit used on the other side of the merge, Git attempts to
> + fast-forward to the descendant. Otherwise, Git will treat this case
> + as a conflict, suggesting as a resolution a submodule commit that
> + is descendant of the conflicting ones, if one exists.
> +
> The 'ort' strategy can take the following options:
I am not going to comment on the text, but as to the formatting, I'd
point out that the existing
+
The 'ort' strategy can ...
construct, i.e. a line with only '+' on it, followed by left-aligned
block of text, is how AsciiDoc wants our second and subsequent
paragraphs for an enumerated list of explanations. Here, the
existing "The 'ort' strategy can ..." is the second paragraph that
follows the paragraph that ends with "... previous default
algorithm, 'recursive'", which is the explanation for the item with
"ort::" heading.
So, you'd need to (1) change the empty line at the beginning of your
added text to have one '+' and nothing else on it, and (2) dedent
the rest of the text you added to abut the left edge of the page.
Ditto for the other hunk on "recursive::".
Thanks.
