Re: Possible bug: Empty magic word list in pathspec is handled differently in short vs. long form

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Possible bug: Empty magic word list in pathspec is handled differently in short vs. long form
From: Lucas Oshiro <lucasseikioshiro@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 11:28:25 -0300
Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <216a7288-b599-4333-ba62-10665d6a94d8@anselmschueler.com>
References: <216a7288-b599-4333-ba62-10665d6a94d8@anselmschueler.com>

> If you run git diff for a pathspec with an empty magic word/symbol list in short form (prefixed by ::) and in long form (prefixed by :():), you get different results.
>

References:
- Possible bug: Empty magic word list in pathspec is handled differently in short vs. long form
  - From: Anselm Schüler

Prev by Date: [PATCH v2 15/16] refs/iterator: implement seeking for "files" iterators
Next by Date: [PATCH v2 0/7] Show progress when downloading from bundle URIs
Previous by thread: Possible bug: Empty magic word list in pathspec is handled differently in short vs. long form
Next by thread: Re: Possible bug: Empty magic word list in pathspec is handled differently in short vs. long form
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux