Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Then the strategy of garbage collection can be arranged in the following way: > > - Repack by starting at the "most complete" repo and work towards the "most > borrowing" ones. During this phase "attic" packs are created. Borrowing repos > get a chance to salvage objects before the alternates prune them away. > > - Prune by starting at the "most borrowing" repo and work towards the "most > complete" ones. During this phase the "attic" packs are cleaned up. > > What do you think? Is this a way for a solution? I would imagine that would work as long as it can be controlled when all the involved repositories are repacked and pruned, such as on repo.or.cz case (but on the other hand it is not really controlled well there and that is the reason you wrote the message X-<). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
