On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 12:01:59AM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote: > It takes about 30 times as long to perform using the reftable backend, > which is concerning. While this is a synthetic measurement, I had > intended to use it to determine the performance characteristics of > the reference update portion when pushing a large repository for the > first time. Interesting, that's an edge case I didn't yet see. I know about some cases where reftables are ~10% slower, but 30x slower is in a different ballpark. > I admit I haven't done any other particular investigation as to what's > going wrong here, but the behaviour is very noticeable so it may be easy > to profile. No worries, I'm already happy to have gotten the report in the first place :) I'll investigate, but probably won't get to it before next week. Thanks! Patrick
