Re: [PATCH] rebase: add `--update-refs=interactive`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 6:33 AM Ivan Shapovalov <intelfx@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2025-02-10 at 15:22 -0500, D. Ben Knoble wrote:
> >
> > Based on `git grep -e '--.*\[=' Documentation/git-*.txt`, I think this
> > should be more like
> >
> >     --update-refs[=interactive]::
> >     --no-update-refs::
> >
> > But maybe that unintentionally suggests that `=interactive` is the default?
>
> Perhaps --update-refs[=(yes|no|interactive)] then? Or is that too
> verbose? Anyway, I don't have a preference, I'll just do what I'm told
> here.

I don't have a strong opinion, and I think this is being discussed
elsewhere in this thread.

> > Should we add a test for this?
> >
>
> Any suggestions what exactly I should test here? I don't have much
> experience testing interactive CLI tools, so I'd appreciate some hints.
>
> --
> Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx /

Give t/README a glance; t3404 is probably a good place to start given
"git grep update-refs t."



-- 
D. Ben Knoble





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux