On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 12:58:06AM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > One other thing I noticed while doing this patch is that our remote ref > status reporting isn't foolproof. We set every ref we send to 'OK' with > the nice effect that if status reporting isn't enabled, we just assume > that it worked. However, if the status coming back is truncated (i.e., > some refs are missing in receive_status), we will just fail to notice and > assume all is well. So to be perfect, we would need a > REF_STATUS_EXPECTING_REPORT. This turned out to be pretty easy, given the other recent changes, and I think it actually makes the code a bit clearer. Please scrap the patch to which I am replying, and I will post a replacement series in a second. -Peff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
