Re: [PATCH 4/5] doc: use .adoc extension for AsciiDoc files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2025-02-07 at 18:05:09, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I was wondering why we remove SubmittingPatches.txt with "make
> clean" there the other day.  There is a Documentation/Makefile
> target to create %.txt from % applied for SubmittingPatches.

Some time back I converted SubmittingPatches to AsciiDoc with a variety
of anchors because it's easier to link to the portions of the document
from the website.  For example, many projects want to use our advice to
use logically separate commits or to describe changes well, and it's
much easier (and honours the license better) to just link to our
documentation than to copy it elsewhere.

> > for CodingGuidelines, though. (We also package
> > ReviewingGuidelines.{html,txt}, but it has a .txt extension.)
> 
> Thanks for noticing an annoying inconsistency that must be rectified
> independent of brian's topic to help it easier for Editors to
> identify the files that are written in AsciiDoc.  If we are shipping
> documents that are exclusively meant for Git developers, we should
> be shipping all of them together.

I agree.  My apologies for missing that.
-- 
brian m. carlson (they/them or he/him)
Toronto, Ontario, CA

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux