Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] rev-list: print additional missing object information

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Justin Tobler <jltobler@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> wouldn't be sufficient to determine where each record would end. Using
> two NUL bytes next to each other to mark the end of a record would work
> though.

I think we already use that convention elsewhere, and that is why I
brought it up as a potential approach to take.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux