On 25/02/03 11:45AM, Christian Couder wrote: > On Sat, Feb 1, 2025 at 9:20 PM Justin Tobler <jltobler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Greetings, > > > > It is possible to configure git-rev-list(1) to print the OID of missing > > objects by setting the `--missing=print` option. While it is useful > > knowing about these objects, it would be nice to have even more context > > about the objects that are missing. Luckily, from an object containing > > the missing object, it is possible to infer additional information the > > missing object. For example, if the tree containing a missing blob still > > exists, the tree entry for the missing object should contain path and > > type information. > > > > This series aims to provide git-rev-list(1) with a new `print-info` > > missing action for the `--missing` option that, when set, behaves like > > the existing `print` action but also prints other potentially > > interesting information about the missing object. > > I took a look and commented a bit on patches 1/4 and 2/4. Not sure my > comments are worth a reroll on their own. The other patches look good > to me. > > Anyway I think you might want to address Phillip Wood's concerns too: > > https://lore.kernel.org/git/76390e3b-e749-4d28-98a5-05db7c5fbcd3@xxxxxxxxx/ > > Thanks. Thanks Christian for the review! -Justin
