Re: undefined behavior in unit tests, was Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] reftable: prevent 'update_index' changes after adding records

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:

>> 	if (!check(ptr))
>> 		return;
>> 
>> As we're in the process of switching to using clar which does exit the text
>> function if a check fails (that means there may be leaks on failure but if
>> the test is failing then I don't think we should be worrying about leaks) I
>> don't know if it is worth fixing these or not. I guess it depends if there
>> are the list of targets for Seyi's Outreachy project.
>
> Ah, yes, should've read your mail first, as you're saying basically the
> same as I did :)

Yup, I 100% agree with both of you.  Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux