Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 29/01/2025 19:52, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> By the way, who is >> <CAPig+cQ49Hdc_8=mRhhJDTny_Kqo6Wg6Nr98rsBN_YXmBrQ6kA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> and why is such an apparently bogus e-mail address Cc'ed? > > That's the Reply-To address from the mail I was replying > to. Unfortunately it does not seem to exist. It just occured to me that it is probably added by a mistake and the sender really wanted to add it to In-Reply-To: instead of Reply-To: I wonder if this is a mistake we can do something to help users avoid? "git send-email" has the "--reply-to=" option and there is a valid use case for that option, so disabling that option is a non-starter. Of course there are other ways to send e-mailed patches, but I do not think of a way to misuse them with reply-to and in-reply-to mixed up. Thoughts?
