shejialuo <shejialuo@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> We will always try to sort the "packed-refs" increasingly by comparing
> the refname. So, we should add checks to verify whether the "packed-refs"
> is sorted.
Do this _ONLY_ when the packed-refs file has a header that declares
"sorted" trait. Insisting on a packed-refs file that does not would
mean you are stricter than the runtime contract allows.
> +struct fsck_packed_ref_entry {
> + int line_number;
> +
> + struct snapshot_record record;
> +};
Not a huge deal, as 1 billion is still plenty of a large number, but
the same comment on the line-number applies here. We might want to
consistently use ulong for line numbers of files we read from.
