Re: [PATCH v2] worktree: detect from secondary worktree if main worktree is bare

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Wow, your explanation is so much better than mine.Thank you for
>> “translating" it for the world :) I’m still trying to get used to
>> the terminology used in this codebase.  I’ll steal your description
>> for sure (if you don’t mind).
>
> You are more than welcome to use the proposed commit message rewrite.
>
> (If you want to acknowledge assistance rendered, a Helped-by: trailer,
> preceding your Signed-off-by:, is the way to do so. Or not. It's up to
> you.)
> ...

> Agreed about the is-bare checks -- and indeed the entire Git startup
> sequence -- being difficult to digest, however...
> ...

Thanks for an easy-to-read review (and thanks OP for working on it,
of course).





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux