Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] doc: add technical design doc for large object promisors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 2:28 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hopefully I'll have time to comment on different parts of the
> documents, but the impression I got was that we should write with
> fewer "we could" and instead say more "we aim to", i.e. be more
> assertive.

I have tried to make the next version of the document more assertive
in some places and clearer in other places by replacing some "could"
with other terms.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux