On 2025-01-19 at 20:39:13, Al Grant wrote: > Yes. But I'm keen to understand how to deal with a merge conflict. > > My IDE is VSCode and when I run the merge I get this image: > > https://imgur.com/a/vynTxaj > > Which highlights this code: > > 255: <<<<<<< HEAD > 256: samples = signal.convolve(samples, [1]*189, 'same')/189 > 257: > 258: #for testing - log to file > 259: #self.f.write(samples.astype(np.float32).tobytes()) > 260: > 261:======= > 262: samples = signal.convolve(samples, [1] * 10, "same") / 189 > 263: > 264: # for testing - log to file > 265: # self.f.write(samples.astype(np.float32).tobytes()) > 266: > 267:>>>>>>> 1f893dc (Make project runnable on Linux) > > Now I would assume that samples = .... from ln 256 abd 262 are the > differences between MAIN and FEATURE? > > But when I search main (at least I think its main - my IDE doesnt tell > me mid rebase process) for ` samples = signal.convolve(samples, > [1]*189, 'same')/189` AND `samples = signal.convolve(samples, [1] * > 10, "same") / 189` - those lines do not exists anywhere in MAIN??? > > So what is going on???? First, I recommend that you set the `merge.conflictStyle` setting to `diff3` so that you get the contents of the merge base as well. That can be illustrative when you have conflicts. It's important to note that a rebase involves replaying individual commits from one branch on top of another, usually using a merge algorithm. That means that it isn't necessarily the case during a rebase that one side is the complete base branch, but rather one side is the base branch _with all of the previous commits you've rebased on top of it_. So if you have this: A - B - C - D - E - F (main) \ - G - H - I - J (feature) and you rebase `feature` on to `main`, you're going to replay G, H, I, and J (in that order) on top of F. So it might not be that the code exists in `main`, but that it comes from one of those intermediate commits. In this case, the conflict should be trivial to fix up in that the code appears (at least to a first glance) to be logically equivalent. I would personally resolve this conflict in favour of the version with a little more whitespace, since that seems nicer to read. -- brian m. carlson (they/them or he/him) Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature