"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:36:40PM +0300, Sergei Organov wrote:
>> "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
[...]
>> >> @@ -1567,8 +1567,8 @@ old history using, for example,
>> >> $ git log master@{1}
>> >> -------------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> -This lists the commits reachable from the previous version of the head.
>> >> -This syntax can be used to with any git command that accepts a commit,
>> >
>> > I actually prefer "head" here. On something like:
>> >
>> > A--B--C
>> > /
>> > o--o--o
>> > \
>> > o--o--o
>> >
>> >
>> > The term "branch" could be used to refer to the whole line of
>> > development consisting of A, B, and C. The term "head", on the other
>> > hand, refers to either C or a ref that points to it. We also use the
>> > terms "branch head" or just "branch" for that case, but I think "head"
>> > is more precise.
>>
>> Then I'd suggest to be precise here, e.g.:
>>
>> "This lists the commits reachable from the previous version of the
>> "master" branch head."
>
> That sounds sensible to me, sure.
OK, I've just submitted patch for that.
--
Sergei.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
