Am 16.01.25 um 11:21 schrieb Jeff King: > And one final thought on this approach: if we do want to do it, perhaps > it would make sense to build on top of the patch you sent. I think yours > fixes the bug in a more direct and obvious way, and then my approach > would merely be internal reorganization on top. I think moving to the right place in one step requires less churn. Let's compare; v2 coming up. René
