Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > I was wondering whether we might want to mark the new command as > experimental at first to allow us to iterate, but the last set of > commands where we have done so are still experimental many years after > they have been introduced. So... probably not a good idea. I am not sure if I agree. Anybody who wants any of these commands that are marked as experimental to be declared stable can propose to do so with a reasonable timeline attached.
