Re: [StGit RFC] A more structured way of calling git

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2007-11-16 08:42:55 +0100, Karl Hasselström wrote:

> The complete state that would have to be saved would be
>
>   * (patchname, commit sha1) pairs for all patches
>
>   * (branchname, branch head sha1) pair
>
>   * the ordered lists of applied, unapplied, and eventually also
>     hidden patches

Oh, and

  * .git/config (one blob)

  * the worktree (one tree object?)

  * the index (one tree object per stage?)

Otherwise, we won't be able to un-clobber them. But a first
implementation could certainly skip this part.

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@xxxxxxxxxxx
      www.treskal.com/kalle
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux