If your claim was right, this bug report got even bigger as a lot of behavior from other subcommands would have to be changed. In fact, what "substantial material" is, has to be defined for every piece of software regarding each output. However, I cannot see how one subcommand's usage message is considered "substantial" whereas another subcommand's usage message is not (besides, I guess, `git branch` is more frequently used than `git reflog`).
Best, Jonas On 15.01.25 12:36, Matěj Cepl wrote:
On Wed Jan 15, 2025 at 12:22 PM CET, Jonas Konrad wrote:What did you do before the bug happened? (Steps to reproduce your issue) I opened a terminal on Arch Linux with a bash shell and called `git branch -h` to get a usage overview of git's `branch` command. I then tried processing the output with `grep` by `git branch -h | grep list` which gave the whole (unfiltered) output, i.e., the displayed message was not processed by `grep`.And that is exactly the correct behaviour. In the world of UNIX, where pipes are normal, utilities should send to the stdout only substantial material, which could be processed down the pipeline. Error messages, help, and similar diagnostics, should go to stderr. Also, you know about `|&`, right? Best, Matěj
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>