Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] hash: introduce unsafe_hash_algo(), drop unsafe_ variants

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 04:14:58PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > (This series is rebased on 'master', which is 14650065b7
> > (RelNotes/2.48.0: fix typos etc., 2025-01-07) at the time of writing).
>
> The previous round was based on
> <cover.1730833506.git.me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> which became
> 'tb/unsafe-hash-test', but this round is based on a recent 'master'
> that does not yet contain it?  Does it mean that the 2-patch series
> the previous round of this series was based on is no longer needed?

Those two patches got squashed together and became the first patch of
this series, so 'tb/unsafe-hash-test' is safe to discard. Thank you for
shuffling the patches around as always :-).

Thanks,
Taylor




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux