René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx> writes: >> It is actually unnecessary to use those function pointers to >> `malloc`/`realloc`/`free`, though: The `reftable` code goes out of its >> way to fall back to the initial allocator when passing `NULL` parameters >> instead. So let's do that instead of causing heap corruptions. > > Ugh. That makes a lot of sense. Sorry for the trouble! :-/ Thanks for a quick Ack.