Re: [PATCH] help: interpret help.autocorrect=1 as "immediate" rather than 0.1s

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Scott,

On Wed, 8 Jan 2025, Scott Chacon via GitGitGadget wrote:

> From: Scott Chacon <schacon@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Many people confusingly set the "help.autocorrect" setting to 1 believing it
> to be a boolean that turns on the autocorrect feature rather than an integer
> value of deciseconds wait time. Since it's impossible for a human being to
> react this quickly, the help message stating that it's waiting for 0.1s
> before continuing becomes confusingly comical.
>
> This patch simply interprets a "1" value as the same as the "immedate"
> autocorrect setting, which makes it skip the 0.1s and simply say that it's
> running the command, which is almost certainly what everyone setting it to
> that value is actually trying to do.

Not trying to brag but I had no problems understanding this commit
message as-is.

> Signed-off-by: Scott Chacon <schacon@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>     help: interpret help.autocorrect=1 as "immediate" rather than 0.1s
>
> Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-1869%2Fschacon%2Fmaster-v1
> Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-1869/schacon/master-v1
> Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/1869
>
>  help.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/help.c b/help.c
> index 5483ea8fd29..e6576644b99 100644
> --- a/help.c
> +++ b/help.c
> @@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ static int git_unknown_cmd_config(const char *var, const char *value,
>  			return config_error_nonbool(var);
>  		if (!strcmp(value, "never")) {
>  			cfg->autocorrect = AUTOCORRECT_NEVER;
> -		} else if (!strcmp(value, "immediate")) {
> +		} else if (!strcmp(value, "immediate") || !strcmp(value, "1")) {

Makes sense to me!

For the record, I do think it was a mistake to treat number values as
"deciseconds" here, it is inconsistent with pretty much any other config
setting. But I also don't see any way to remediate this design mistake at
this stage.

Thank you for working on this and making the feature at least a little bit
more usable.

Ciao,
Johannes

>  			cfg->autocorrect = AUTOCORRECT_IMMEDIATELY;
>  		} else if (!strcmp(value, "prompt")) {
>  			cfg->autocorrect = AUTOCORRECT_PROMPT;
>
> base-commit: 14650065b76b28d3cfa9453356ac5669b19e706e
> --
> gitgitgadget
>
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux