Shubham Kanodia <shubham.kanodia10@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Junio, what do you think about my previous suggestion — do you think > that changing the remote behaviours is a blocker for this change to > make its way to master? Yes, changing the behaviour of an existing command in the same patch that adds a new feature, and doing so without clearly explaining why such a change is a good idea in the proposed log message, are both huge blockers. Not just to 'master', but to anywhere near 'next'. Thanks.
