On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 08:56:57AM +0100, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > > Plus I don't think "find" propagates the exit code from -exec anyway. I > > think you can check the exit status with more find logic, so you'd then > > use a conditional -print for each file like: > > It should. Quoting find(1): > > If any invocation with the `+' form returns a non-zero value as exit > status, then find returns a non-zero exit status. Ah, right. I tried using ';' to look at individual files, and it does ignore the code. But of course we don't need to know which logs had leaks, only that there was at least one. I think we can make it even simpler, though. I'll post patches in a moment. -Peff
