On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 02:06:59PM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 01:56:40PM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > > > I do wonder if it will affect run times. Presumably GitHub has made it > > pretty fast to get things started on the bare runner image. Now we're > > pulling docker images. That is hopefully pretty optimized and cached, > > but it is extra work. Might be worth measuring. > > Just peeking at your CI run here: > > https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/12597967146 > > versus the latest run on Junio's master: > > https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/12589300693 > > I see: > > job | old | new > --------------------|------|------ > linux-TEST-vars 11m30s 10m54s > linux-asan-ubsan 30m26s 31m14s > linux-gcc 9m47s 10m6s > linux-gcc-default 9m47s 9m41s > linux-leaks 25m50s 25m21s > linux-meson 10m36s 10m41s > linux-reftable 10m25s 10m23s > linux-reftable-leaks 27m18s 27m28s > linux-sha256 9m54s 10m31s > > So it looks like any change is lost in the noise (sha256 is noticeably > slower, but most jobs aren't, and some are even faster). Thanks for verifying my claims! Patrick
