Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:
> I wonder though: does this have any impact on '<rev>^{<type>}' and other
> syntaxes where we use '^' instead of '@'?
> ...
> Do these really need the FUNNYNAMES prereq? The prereq seems to only be
> about embedded quotes, tabs and newlines and is disallowed on MinGW. But
> I think both '{' and '@' should work alright there, shouldn't they?
Thanks for a review. I am too curious how this change interacts
with syntax with {braces} that do not use "@".
