Re: [PATCH 1/3] git-bisect: war on "sed"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Nov 15, 2007 7:09 PM, David Kastrup <dak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Er, I suppose -- if you are acquainted with that particular shell
> > variable syntax (I suspect knowledge of sed is far more widespread).
>
> sed is rather bad with regard to portability.  If you take a look at
> the respective portability section in the autoconf file, it is almost
> longer than that of Bourne shells.

I don't think that's really a fair characterization -- almost all of
the autoconf sed portability caveats concern weird corner cases in the
dusty corners of the language (and some are "common" issues with other
tools, i.e., avoiding ^ and $ inside of regexp groups).

For typical straightforward usage, there seems little problem.

[The main portability problems I've actually _noticed_ with sed are
the "-e" versus ";" issue and what happens with "\n" in various
contexts...]

-Miles

-- 
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux