Sorry for the noise. I forgot to CC others, so I am resending it. On Thu, Dec 26, 2024 at 5:56 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Eric Ju <eric.peijian@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Range-diff against v7: > > -: ---------- > 1: c09e21a9d6 cat-file: add declaration of variable i inside its for loop > > -: ---------- > 2: ed04a4a7c4 fetch-pack: refactor packet writing > > -: ---------- > 3: bc52c4f80c fetch-pack: move fetch initialization > > -: ---------- > 4: 4c1b989c41 serve: advertise object-info feature > > -: ---------- > 5: dbc95a9ae5 transport: add client support for object-info > > -: ---------- > 6: f244ec8a2f cat-file: add remote-object-info to batch-command > > This is curious. Did you compare the right things? > Thank you. I think I may compare it wrong. > -- > 2.47.0 > > Information Footer: > base-commit: 8f8d6eee531b3fa1a8ef14f169b0cb5035f7a772 > Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/git/-/merge_requests/168 > > If the base-commit information is relevant, please do not write it > below the "signature" like (i.e. a line that consists only of > dash-dash-space near the end of the message), as some e-mail programs > consider them irrelevant and omit from quoting. > Roger that. > I tried to apply them on top of 8f8d6eee (The seventh batch, > 2024-11-01) but the last step [6/6] fails to apply (the first five > applied cleanly, and matched what I already had). > > Could you help to figure out what is going wrong on your end? > Should I resend v8 or send a v9 instead? > Thanks.
